// No rightclick script v.2.5
// (c) 1998 barts1000
// barts1000@aol.com
// This script and others available free at http://www.lissaexplains.com
var message="keep to urself."; // Message for the alert box
function click(e) {
if (document.all) {
if (event.button == 2) {
// Don't edit below!
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
if (document.layers) {
if (e.which == 3) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}
if (document.layers) {
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
}
document.onmousedown=click;
// -->
i think i like bubbles for their transience. pretty little swirls of colour that exist for only a brief glorious moment. and how they can never be captured or their existence prolonged for more than what was meant to be. people have tried to modify them in an attempt to make them less fragile, creating those whatchacallit artificial bubbles which land on hair and faces and everything else. but these dont have the shine that normal bubbles do, and upon attaching themselves to a surface, shrivel up till all tt's left is a sticky residue. while the usual bubbles leave not a trace of their presence. isn't the unpredictability and impermanence the main appeal of bubbles? so why do pple persist in trying to retain the beauty in things that can only be found there and then?