// No rightclick script v.2.5
// (c) 1998 barts1000
// barts1000@aol.com
// This script and others available free at http://www.lissaexplains.com
var message="keep to urself."; // Message for the alert box
function click(e) {
if (document.all) {
if (event.button == 2) {
// Don't edit below!
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
if (document.layers) {
if (e.which == 3) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}
if (document.layers) {
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
}
document.onmousedown=click;
// -->
a thought suddenly struck me. how do mermaids reproduce? like binary fission?
[Listening to: only hope by switchfoot]
Thursday, February 24, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
girls shouldn't use their vulnerabilities. doing so would be like degrading yourself to a lower position intentionally to make others feel the need to take care of yu. a woman is not someone a man needs to protect, she is someone who challenges the man and is his equal. of course i'm not saying females should all be like in the modern day fairy tales in which the women are trained in martial arts and can kick the guys' butts [think electra and dark angel etc etc] but garnering sympathy bcoz we're more helpless is just low. sheesh i think im turning into a feminist.
[Listening to: i just wanna live by good charlotte]
Friday, February 18, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
pocahontas is one of my fave disneys. i like that she was indignant when john smith looked down on her way of life; i like that she had a funky grandmother tree to guide, not preach; i liked that she kept her identity by not leaving with him when he went back.
come roll in all the riches all around yu, and for once, never wonder what they're worth
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
i wonder if heaven could ever be boring. heaven being defined as a place with only positive feelings and everything in pastel colours. technically it shouldn't, since yu're supposed to feel most blissful there. but they say too much of a good thing can be bad. can happiness be sustained? i like the idea of pocket-sized heavens, where yu don't stay permanently but instead be immersed in once in a while. hohumho.
[Listening to: sooner or later by switchfoot]
Saturday, February 12, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
when they say we should oh cherish everyday as if it were our last, do they really expect us to sit there and think omigosh i'm so appreciating what i have now i love my thisthisthis and my thatthatthat and my whateverwhateverwhatevers and by the time yu finish thinking all that it wont be surprising if yu're already gone. people tend to take for granted what they have until they lose it, and that's just the way it is. i don't see a point in spending every moment in your life feeling grateful for something and imagining what it's like without it. it's almost as much a waste of time as moping over something that can no longer be. there are high points in everyone's lives; enjoy when possible and when it's over, look forward to the next. heck the sentimentalists- why be bogged down by unnecessary emotion? i see freedom in accepting things; excessive worry does nothing for me.
[Listening to: when i'm gone by 3 doors down]
Friday, February 04, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
the problem with people doing yu favours is that yu end up feeling indebted to them. in fact we're almost like a marketplace where transactions take place all the time, people giving and people receiving, and the only difference is that the price yu pay is entirely up to yu. yu could even choose not to return the favour at all, but one must remember that in business networks, reputation plays a large part too. having things done for yu is definitely worth appreciating, however the feeling yu get that yu owe them really makes one reconsider accepting favours.
and they say that a hero can save us, i'm not gonna stand here and wait
[Listening to: hero by chad kroeger]
Thursday, February 03, 2005
[by the way i tried to say]
funny how the word substitution has negative connotations even if not specified. substitution as opposed to original, which by logical processes leads us to think of replacements, and in which case would naturally imply inadequacy to live up to expectations. a substitute can never be better than the original, for even it were a good substitute, it would mean that it has served its purpose well, possibly as well as the original, but never surpassing it, for why should it be called a substitute then? substitution suggests a step down, as if making do with something lesser.
[Listening to: road trippin' by red hot chilli peppers]