// No rightclick script v.2.5
// (c) 1998 barts1000
// barts1000@aol.com
// This script and others available free at http://www.lissaexplains.com
var message="keep to urself."; // Message for the alert box
function click(e) {
if (document.all) {
if (event.button == 2) {
// Don't edit below!
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
if (document.layers) {
if (e.which == 3) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}
if (document.layers) {
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
}
document.onmousedown=click;
// -->
i think i'm confused. it's easy to make decisions when one's principles are threatened, but much more complicated when the principles in question aren't yours. what if by imposing your opinion on others, yu end up infringing their right to make decisions? and if someone's morals were different from yours, who are yu to decide that they are bad? hmm. are yu neglecting your own principles by choosing not to interfere with others'? questionsquestions. i need some boundaries to be defined.