// No rightclick script v.2.5
// (c) 1998 barts1000
// barts1000@aol.com
// This script and others available free at http://www.lissaexplains.com
var message="keep to urself."; // Message for the alert box
function click(e) {
if (document.all) {
if (event.button == 2) {
// Don't edit below!
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
if (document.layers) {
if (e.which == 3) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}
if (document.layers) {
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
}
document.onmousedown=click;
// -->
i have a theory- that the attraction between 2 pple, not counting lust, can only be like and not love till they experience a tremendous external event or obstacle that, just through the process of going through it together, forms a special bond between them, or maybe fortifies the initial interest they had in each other. people are together bcos of like, or bcos they're bound by duty, or even habit, seldom bcos of love. worry, panic and the pure need for self-survival brings about the worst and the best in pple, and only when yu see all sides of a person do yu really accept him for who he is and then love him. of course, the definition of a tremendous external event is broad and one that i find more relevant to most would be time. time is a test in itself, and with time more and more of a person is revealed, and loving a person means loving him wholly, flaws and all. i see love between an old couple that have been together decades, i see like between a young couple still finding out where they stand.
needless to say i question romeo and juliet, one of the most famous romantic tragedies of all time. i believe they could have found love eventually, but by killing themselves out of love, they killed their chances of love. maybe that means i can never be a romantic, who knows.